Article content material

The Calgary decide who sentenced a Kanai First Nations man to 5 years for a violent historic rape didn’t fail to think about his Indigenous background in reaching a match punishment, Alberta’s high courtroom has dominated.

Article content material

In a unanimous determination, a three-member Alberta Courtroom of Attraction panel stated provincial courtroom Decide Greg Stirling didn’t err in sentencing James Oka.

In writing the courtroom’s determination, Justice Thomas Wakeling famous Oka argued that Stirling didn’t take into consideration a piece of the Prison Code that requires judges to think about the actual circumstances of Aboriginal offenders.

“The crux of Mr. Oka’s argument is that Decide Stirling didn’t adequately account for his circumstances as an Aboriginal offender and the “genocidal nature” of the residential college system,” Wakeling wrote.

“As well as, Mr. Oka submits that Decide Stirling failed to think about rehabilitation as a related sentencing goal. He asks us to cut back his sentence by one to 2 years,” Wakeling stated.