[ad_1]
The grievance had alleged irregularities in a July 2019 procurement bid for 1,000 low flooring BS-IV and BS-VI buses
New Delhi: Delhi LG V Ok Saxena has accepted a proposal to ahead a grievance to the CBI to probe the alleged corruption within the procurement of 1,000 low-floor buses by the DTC, official sources have mentioned.
A grievance addressed to Saxena in June this 12 months had claimed that the appointment of the Minister of Transport because the chairman of the committee for tendering and procurement of buses by Delhi Transport Company (DTC) was completed in a “premeditated method”.
It had additionally alleged that the appointment of DIMTS as bid administration marketing consultant for this tender was completed with an goal to facilitate wrongdoing.
The grievance had alleged irregularities in a July 2019 procurement bid for 1,000 low flooring BS-IV and BS-VI buses and one other bid made in March 2020 for the acquisition and annual upkeep contract for low flooring BS-VI buses, the sources mentioned.
The grievance was forwarded to the chief secretary on July 22 to hunt feedback from the departments of the Delhi authorities and consequently their suggestions.
The report submitted by the chief secretary on August 19 had identified sure “irregularities”, following which the L-G has now forwarded the grievance to the CBI, sources mentioned, including the CBI is already conducting a preliminary inquiry into the matter.
Saxena has accepted the clubbing of the present grievance with the grievance already being inquired into by the central probe company.
A committee, headed by retired IAS officer OP Aggrawal, constituted to look into the fees of corruption within the procurement of buses in June 2021, in its report submitted in August final 12 months, had clearly indicted the AAP authorities for “procedural deviations in the whole tendering and procurement process”, the sources mentioned.
“Felony misconduct by public servants on this tender train will likely be ascertained by the investigating company, ie the CBI. On the premise of this, the Chief Secretary beneficial to refer the matter to the CBI, which was accepted by the LG,” mentioned a supply.
There was no speedy response from the Delhi authorities on the matter.
[ad_2]