By Ashis Biswas
Ever since underground chief Jiban Singha of the banned Kamtapur Liberation Organisation (KLO) reiterated the decision for a separate state, there have been indicators of a resumption of exercise on a part of its activists in Assam and North Bengal.
Northeast India media reported the arrest of two KLO activists from Kokrajhar, Assam, some days in the past. Allegedly they have been attempting to renew their extortion-related actions and had requested for cash from an area businessman who complained to the police. The stories didn’t make it clear whether or not the activists have been accumulating cash on behalf of the proposed Kamtapur state as per the previous KLO demand or performing on their very own. Regardless of stories of inner divisions and a shift on a part of a few of its cadres to different teams, the KLO has not but ceased functioning completely, decreased because it has grow to be.
Sources mentioned the selection of Kokrajhar city, a significant industrial/administrative centre of the tribal Bodoland autonomous space, was important. Presumably KLO operatives sought to take advantage of the normal mistrust between majority Assamiyas and minority Bodo tribes individuals in an ethnically delicate area.
Whether or not in Assam or North Bengal, the overall notion is that the KLO has ceased to be a severe secessionist organisation together with the ULFA in recent times. The covid-related demise a while in the past of its former chief Atul Roy had affected cadre morale. Nevertheless, a lately launched video apparently by the KLO, confirmed KLO renewing name for an unbiased state. It went viral however didn’t evoke a lot response from established political events.
In it KLO strongly attacked West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee who firmly opposed all calls for to partition West Bengal, whether or not by the Gorkhas or different ethnic teams. KLO reminded the Chief Minister of Coochbehar’s ‘unbiased’ standing whilst India was being partitioned in 1947. It by no means shaped a part of West Bengal, he insisted.
Nevertheless, safety analysts didn’t ignore one a part of KLO assertion, whereby he claimed that his organisation had now settled its ideological variations with the higher Coochbehar Peoples Affiliation (GCPA). Now the motion for a higher separate Coochbehar state, to be carved out of present districts in Central/north Bengal and Southern Assam, can be resumed with the full help of the main ethnic group of the area as a complete—the Rajbonshis.
Whereas political leaders/events in Assam didn’t touch upon KLO assertion, they took the views expressed by veteran north Bengal-based chief Mr. Ananta Ray, extra critically. Talking independently of KLO chief lately, the GCPA chief whose mass following is understood to be higher than others, re-endorsed the decision for a separate Coochbehar state. He didn’t discuss with the KLO.
Nevertheless, observers mentioned it couldn’t have been a coincidence that the 2 non-mainstream political leaders would communicate out stressing their comparable tribal loyalties and calls for at about the identical time with out prior coordination.
Proof of this got here from Assam leaders and teams expressing their agency rejection for the statehood demand for Coochbehar state. In video releases and intensive messaging on the social media, they dismissed Mr Ray as a self-styled chief based mostly in North Bengal, with the implication that he didn’t take pleasure in a lot help in Assam.
Different sources nonetheless, discovered Mr Ray’s views and claims extra intriguing. He mentioned categorically that union Dwelling Minister Mr Amit Shah was totally apprised of present ethnic/tribal sentiments within the delicate Assam-North Bengal border areas and adjoining districts. Mr Shah, he claimed, had promised a sympathetic consideration of lengthy pending Rajbonshi political calls for in search of higher equity and justice, as a marginalised group.
Assam-based politicians didn’t touch upon this a part of Mr Ray’s observations. There was, nonetheless, a stronger response from West Bengal Trinamool Congress (TMC) chief Udayan Guha based mostly in Coochbehar itself.
Strongly attacking KLO chief for his views, Guha, usually described by his political opponents as an area ‘Bahubali’, mentioned individuals like Singha didn’t have any help in any respect in North Bengal or elsewhere. If he or his followers tried to create bother and unrest, the state Authorities and customary individuals would decisively ‘crush’ them.
Singha retaliated stating that Guha was an ‘outsider’ in a Rajbonshi-dominated space and solely tribal permission had enabled him to settle in Coochbehar. Guha retorted that he had been residing within the district for 4 generations and didn’t want anybody’s confirmatory certification.
Current indications counsel that the tensions and agitations of ethnicity-based politics and the acquainted agitational method adopted by most native teams to focus on their previous grievances within the North Bengal -Assam area, weren’t over but.
Once more, whether or not in Assam or West Bengal, no political chief may communicate with any certainty as to the function of the BJP-ruled Central Authorities within the current scenario. Whereas the BJP had earlier supported the formation of smaller, separate states on the bottom of efficient governance, it had by no means categorically accepted of the demand for a separate Gorkhaland, elevating a lot of questions on the difficulty. Nor had the BJP on the nationwide degree given any indication that the creation of a separate state of Coochbehar, to be carved out of Assam and West Bengal, was being thought of critically.
Nevertheless, the social gathering has given its common approval to the concept of a separate North Bengal state inside West Bengal on the state social gathering degree, annoying the ruling TMC no finish.
As issues stand, the brand new Coochbehar state would come with elements of Malda, Murshidabad, Dinajpur, Darjeeling and different areas in West Bengal, together with elements of Goalpara, Dhubri, Bongaigaon, Bodoland, Chirang and different territories in Assam. At completely different occasions throughout earlier centuries, the unbiased kingdom of Coochbehar did rule over many of those and different territories, in accordance with observers. (IPA Service)
The submit Demand For Separate State In Tribal Belt Of Bengal Revives Once more first appeared on IPA Newspack.
