LRT inquiry: Metropolis argues contractors ought to maintain blame for LRT points

Article content material

The Metropolis of Ottawa pushed again towards claims that the conduct of its workers or Mayor Jim Watson performed any position in issues with the LRT system in a prolonged closing assertion delivered to the Ottawa Gentle Rail Transit Public Inquiry, whereas RTG argued town typically appeared pushed by political motivation somewhat than recommendation from its consultants.

Article content material

“(Rideau Transit Group) let the Metropolis down and it’s RTG that needs to be referred to as to account in respect of the problems affecting reliability of the system in order that transit riders within the metropolis can depend on this new system that they purchased and paid for. Taxpayers mustn’t bear the burden of personal sector failures,” wrote town’s authorized counsel within the doc.

Ongoing points — from delays to derailments to wheel cracking and different issues — have pissed off members of the general public, in addition to transit advocates and members of metropolis council.

The town’s counsel for the inquiry argued non-public contractors concerned within the undertaking needs to be held accountable “for the historic and ongoing failures within the design, building and upkeep of the LRT.”

Article content material

In a press launch on the 105-page closing assertion Monday, town stated its “robust need (is) to make sure RTG and its subcontractors are held accountable.”

“Ottawa residents are rightfully pissed off that the LRT has not all the time lived as much as expectations,” town’s assertion reads.

RTG Events, in its closing assertion, argues metropolis officers set unrealistic expectations, that it confronted political stress, and that town took “an inappropriately inflexible and adversarial method to the undertaking” following the 2016 Rideau Avenue sinkhole. Typically, in response to the assertion, town appeared pushed by political motivation greater than recommendation from its consultants.

“In some ways, the issues that arose in the course of the building and launch of the system — delays to the initially projected completion date and reliability issues with the autos that disrupted service — have been fairly frequent issues for a posh infrastructure undertaking like this one,” RTG Events wrote in its closing assertion.

Article content material

“The issues with the undertaking had an outsized influence on Ottawa’s residents as a result of their municipal authorities set unrealistic expectations. Elected officers promised the general public a turnkey system and campaigned on delivering it with no delays. When their very own advisers warned them that no complicated transit system, newly-built and operated, would launch problem-free, the political die was already solid,” it argues.

The town and RTG have been battling one another on a number of fronts, together with on a metropolis discover of default associated to the 2 prepare derailments in 2021 and the delay in opening the 12.5-kilometre LRT line.

Earlier this 12 months, RTG claimed $189.7 million in damages allegedly attributable to the Metropolis of Ottawa in a countersuit associated to the Confederation Line’s building delay.

Article content material

The countersuit and assertion of defence have been filed in April as a part of a case launched by town over the delay in opening the LRT system, which welcomed prospects on Sept. 14, 2019.

The town’s closing assertion to the general public inquiry rejects options made in the course of the hearings that selections by its workers, political stress from Mayor Watson to verify the undertaking was on time and on funds, and restricted communications with council in regards to the system’s readiness to launch have been amongst elements that performed into points with the LRT.

It repeats town’s preliminary considerations that the inquiry had been referred to as by the provincial authorities “as a lot for political causes as to assist the general public perceive the issues with the system.”

Article content material

The town argues these considerations have been accentuated by the method taken by fee counsel in its investigation and cross-examination of metropolis representatives and consultants in the course of the public hearings, which ran between mid-June and early July, in comparison with different witnesses.

“It appeared at instances that the general public sector was on trial. The town was criticized each for being too laborious on RTG and too mushy,” the closing assertion stated.

“A big period of time was spent analyzing the Metropolis’s conduct with respect to trial operating, whereas virtually no time was dedicated to analyzing the technical points…”

Pre-launch trial operating for Ottawa’s Stage 1 LRT was one space of debate in the course of the inquiry. The trial run standards have been lowered from a 98-per-cent efficiency requirement to 96 per cent. A number of councillors complained to the fee that details about the trial runnings was withheld from most members of council, one thing town’s closing assertion defended as a part of the routine delegation of authority to workers.

Article content material

“Extra importantly, having councillors debate technical points, once they lack the technical data possessed by Metropolis workers and its advisors, not solely would have been unproductive, it may have risked improper and misinformed selections being made,” it argued.

The closing assertion particularly argued that Watson behaved appropriately, saying he didn’t intrude with workers decision-making or deliberately mislead council.

Amongst its greater than 20 suggestions to the inquiry are that town ought to “clearly talk with council” on when it plans to report and about what info on the outset of a undertaking.

It additionally advisable an unbiased overview of efficiency, deductions and the administration of the fee mechanism may very well be carried out for the primary 12 months of service.

Article content material

Amongst different suggestions in its personal closing assertion, RTG argues public authorities ought to restrict political interference in initiatives and enhance transparency, and that each one events ought to comply with constant collaboration in future initiatives.

RTG additionally argues that “optimism bias” typically applies in complicated initiatives and “is a structural downside inherent to the system itself and subsequently requires a structural answer,” which it says governments could be in the very best place to implement.

Different contributors have additionally filed closing statements, together with Infrastructure Ontario, which argued that there is no such thing as a proof that town’s selection of a P3, or public-private partnership supply mannequin for the mega-project performed any position in subsequent issues “or that P3s needs to be deserted as an possibility the place applicable to the wants of a undertaking …”

Article content material

The Amalgamated Transit Union, Native 279, which represents transit employees, argued that the P3 mannequin launched income into the undertaking, creating incentives for each Alstom and RTG to understaff and under-resource the undertaking, one thing each events deny.

The union stated it “believes that the proof introduced earlier than the Inquiry calls into query the present desire for P3 buildings as the premise for brand spanking new public transit initiatives on this province”.

Inquiry commissioner Justice William Hourigan has till the tip of November to submit a last report with conclusions and suggestions.

Your complete closing assertion from town is out there at https://www.ottawalrtpublicinquiry.ca/information/proof/Written-Closing-Submissions/Written-Closing-Submission-Metropolis-of-Ottawa.PDF

With information from Jon Keen, Postmedia workers