“They are saying that the Voice will solely apply to insurance policies that have an effect on Indigenous Australians however certainly overseas coverage and defence coverage have an effect on Indigenous Australians. We nonetheless don’t know what the physique goes to seem like – how it will likely be made up, and which communities will probably be represented and the way they are going to be chosen,” he mentioned.

Dutton additionally reiterated his issues in regards to the potential for judicial interpretation.

“Simply because former Excessive Court docket judges are helping with the drafting of the Voice laws … doesn’t stop the Excessive Court docket making interpretations of that laws,” he mentioned.

He mentioned the opposition wished to stay generous-spirited and open-minded in regards to the Voice, however the get together room wouldn’t resolve its remaining place till its questions have been answered.

The Coalition’s reservations spotlight the groundwork Labor must do inside parliament to construct help for the Voice. This has been made tougher by the hardening stance of Greens First Nations spokeswoman Lidia Thorpe, who has referred to as the referendum a “waste of cash” and accused Labor of getting “no clear pathway” and making an attempt to “ram this down our throats”.

Loading

Nevertheless, Thorpe struck a extra conciliatory tone on Tuesday following a 20-minute assembly with Burney throughout which the pair agreed to debate the Voice in additional element at a later date.

Describing the assembly as “good”, Thorpe mentioned she had raised the Greens’ push for suggestions to be carried out from the Bringing Them House report on the Stolen Era and the royal fee into Aboriginal deaths in custody – two of the get together’s key calls for in change for supporting the Voice.

Throughout the Labor caucus assembly, Burney informed Labor MPs to not be “distracted” when requested why Greens voters appeared extra constructive in regards to the Voice than a few of their elected representatives.