RFA: Does China proceed to pursue that expansionist technique right this moment?

Nagao: If the above historic commentary is true, China will proceed to escalate its actions as a result of, over the previous decade, the army steadiness has shifted in its favor.

In keeping with the Stockholm Worldwide Peace Analysis Institute army expenditure database, from 2011-2020 China elevated its army expenditure by 76%. Throughout the identical interval, India elevated its army expenditure by 34%, Australia by 33%, and Japan by solely 2.4%. The US decreased its expenditure by 10%. 

On the identical time, China has tried to increase its territorial claims within the South China Sea, the East China Sea, Taiwan, the South Pacific, the Indo-China border, and the Indian Ocean as a result of it sees an influence vacuum in these areas. Within the waters across the Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands, China’s Coast Guard has elevated intruding exercise from 12 instances in 2011 to 819 instances in 2013, 707 instances in 2015, and 1,097 instances in 2019. On the western border, China made 213 intrusions into Indian territory in 2011. It elevated the variety of intrusions into Indian territory yearly: 426 instances in 2012, 473 instances in 2017, and 663 instances in 2019. Since 2019, within the South China Sea, China has repeatedly intruded concurrently into the unique financial zones of Vietnam, Malaysia, and the Philippines.

RFA: What’s the political and army context of the beginning of Quad?

Nagao: The strategic objective of the Quad is to re-establish the army steadiness to finish the facility vacuums that China is making an attempt to fill. To do that, they needn’t solely to extend their protection funds but in addition to restructure their very own safety programs.

Traditionally, the USA and its allies within the Asia-Pacific area have organized safety forces based mostly on the “hub and spoke” mannequin. Nonetheless, this mannequin is now not sensible for stopping Chinese language enlargement.

The “hub and spoke” sample is a grid-like association like a bicycle wheel, in that there’s a hub and spokes woven collectively to maintain the wheel regular in movement.

On this “hub and spoke”-based safety system, the wheel hub is the USA, and the spokes are U.S. allies reminiscent of Japan, Australia, Taiwan, the Philippines, Thailand, and South Korea within the Indo-Pacific. This mannequin is closely depending on the U.S. China’s latest enlargement reveals that the present system is now not ample to thwart Chinese language expansionist technique.

As a result of the present safety mannequin doesn’t work nicely, the USA and its allies have been restructuring the safety system based mostly on new linkages. On this new community, U.S. allies and companions work collectively and share the safety burden with the USA and with one another.

That’s the reason not too long ago there have been many multilateral safety cooperation agreements, reminiscent of U.S.-Japan-India, Japan-India-Australia, Australia-U.Okay.-U.S., India-Australia-Indonesia, India-Australia-France, and U.S.-India-Israel-UAE. These types of cooperation are creating a brand new panorama of safety within the area.

In that context, the Quad is only one of many examples of how nations work collectively and share the burden of regional safety when coping with China, an rising army energy accompanied by worrisome expansionist nationalism.

Defending a number of fronts

RFA: How does the Quad work to cope with China’s expansionist technique?

Nagao: The Quad’s technique is to construct a sport to power China to defend a number of fronts directly. As soon as the Quad organizes such a community, China should concurrently allocate protection sources towards the U.S. and Japan on the Pacific facet in addition to towards India on the India-China border. Though China has been rising army spending quickly, the cooperation of the Quad’s 4 nations will keep the army steadiness. That can make China rethink its ambition in order that peace and worldwide order could be maintained.

The flexibility to assault is the core component of the above sport. Within the Asia-Pacific, solely the U.S. possesses the aptitude to assault China. If Japan, Australia, and India share the identical long-range strike functionality, the mixed capabilities of all 4 Quad nations power China to defend on a number of fronts.

In September 2021, Australia, the UK, and the USA introduced the institution of AUKUS, an alliance specializing in serving to Australia purchase and keep eight nuclear submarines. As soon as Australia has a fleet of nuclear submarines with long-range strike capabilities, the army imbalance right this moment in all the Asia-Pacific area will change.

Non-Quad nations reminiscent of Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, and South Korea are additionally rising their long-range strike capabilities with surface-to-surface missiles. These elements additionally contribute to the steadiness of forces within the area.

RFA: India is a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Group, a company established by China to counterbalance the West. So why did Japan and the U.S. invite India to affix Quad?

Nagao: To cope with China, India is required. With out India, China can focus its army energy towards Japan, the U.S. facet.

And India’s stance towards China may be very robust. There is no such thing as a Chinatown in India. Such a rustic is uncommon on the earth. India is essentially the most hawkish nation towards China.

India’s involvement in SCO, BRICS, and many others doesn’t matter. India wants a Central Asia coverage together with Afghanistan. That’s the reason they should be part of. However India doesn’t be part of the anti-U.S. motion even when they’re in these teams.

Opening up the Quad

RFA: South Korea reportedly seeks to attend the Quad summit as an observer in Might. Does the Quad have a mechanism to open the door for different nations to affix as non-member standing? Which nations can be part of as observers?

Nagao: The Quad is the counter-China group. If South Korea joins, it creates issues.

South Korea has hesitated to point out a robust stance towards China. China is a proper ally of North Korea, they usually (collectively) fought in Korea. On this case, South Korea can’t play a key function within the Quad in the event that they be part of.

And if South Korea joins, South Korea needs to speak concerning the North Korean drawback within the Quad assembly. However India isn’t within the subject.

As well as, if South Korea joins, Japan and South Korea will battle one another as a result of there are many issues, together with their territorial dispute.

Subsequently, if South Korea joins, the Quad will lose its essential function (to counter China).

South Korea can contribute to the Quad or the Indo-Pacific as a result of South Korea is exporting weapons to strengthen army capabilities within the nations round China. For instance, India, Indonesia, Philippines are importing weapons from South Korea. South Korea can contribute to countering China’s technique case-by-case.

RFA: What technique does China apply to cope with the Quad? If nations like Vietnam and different ASEAN nations take part within the Quad, how ought to they take part to get extra advantages however not provoke China to assault?

Nagao: Southeast Asian nations have to cease China’s territorial enlargement. However on the identical time, China’s funding and commerce are nonetheless influential for Southeast Asian nations. As a result of Quad-China competitors is escalating, sooner or later, Southeast Asian nations want to decide on a facet. And eventually, the Quad will win the competitors towards China. Certainly, there was no nation that competed with the U.S. that survived (USSR, Japan, Germany). Thus, pro-Quad is useful for Southeast Asia … Progressively, Southeast Asian nations can shift their stance towards Quad, but it surely shouldn’t be too provocative towards China. That’s pro-Quad neutrality.