Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) had an distinctive efficiency within the debate in opposition to Democrat midterm challenger Congresswoman Val Demings on Tuesday, hammering her for her excessive place on quite a lot of points because the moderators continued to point out their biased hand.
Throughout one specific biased second on the debate, the moderator pressed Rubio to state if he helps any exceptions for abortion whereas not as soon as urgent Val Demings on if she helps any restrictions for the apply. Despite the fact that Rubio stated that he has at all times supported federal abortion bans that present exceptions no matter his private pro-life positions, the moderator saved urgent him on the query.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) refuses, for the second time, to reply the moderator’s query about whether or not he would assist a nationwide abortion ban with no exceptions for rape and incest:
“We’re by no means gonna get a vote on a legislation that doesn’t have exceptions.” pic.twitter.com/D5f3U3QNCc
— The Recount (@therecount) October 18, 2022
Regardless of the biased questioning, Rubio continued his assaults on Val Demings and famous that she holds an extremist place on abortion, akin to her assist for taxpayer-funded abortions and the truth that she couldn’t admit to sponsoring any restrictions.
“The extremist on abortion on this marketing campaign is Congresswoman Demings,” he stated. “She helps no restrictions, no limitations of any sort. She’s in opposition to a four-month ban, she voted in opposition to a five-month ban. She helps taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand for any purpose at any time up till the second of delivery. That’s what she helps, that’s the acute place right here.”
Within the opening query, debate moderator Todd McDermott confirmed his biased hand by characterizing the current disastrous Hurricane Ian as a product of local weather change.
“Three weeks in the past tomorrow, Hurricane Ian hit Florida as one of many 5 strongest storms to make landfall within the U.S. What federal motion is required, beginning now, to guard Florida from sea ranges projected to rise a foot or extra in lower than 30 years whereas extra frequent monster storms threaten our lives and livelihoods?” requested McDermott.
“Local weather change is actual. If we don’t do one thing about it, and we’re going to pay a horrible value for it. Extra intense … storms like we’ve seen. As the waters in the ocean proceed to heat up, extra intense storms, extra flooding, extra simply devastation,” she defined, failing to state how, precisely, Democrat insurance policies would assist management the climate.
Later, when the talk shifted towards voting rights, Rick Christie, govt editor of the Palm Seashore Publish, appeared visibly miffed when the moderator moved the dialogue alongside after Marco Rubio had publicly said he would assist the outcomes of the 2022 election and that he opposed a federal takeover of elections.
“I’ll assist it as a result of Florida has good legal guidelines,” stated Rubio.
“Truthful sufficient! Let’s transfer on to the subsequent query,” responded McDermott.
“Uhh… I don’t assume we gave Congresswoman Demings the possibility–” interjected Christie.
“We’re going to maneuver on to the subsequent query,” stated McDermott.
As the opposite moderator proceeded to ask a query, Christie audibly sighed as he shook the second off.
On the difficulty of the Second Modification, Marco Rubio stood agency on his assist for gun rights as Val Demings attacked him for allegedly doing nothing to guard Floridians from mass shooters. Most notably, Rubio voiced his assist for a sure sort of “Crimson Flag” legislation that will not enable residents to petition left-wing judges.
“One of many first issues I did once I obtained again to Washington is I sponsored a bipartisan crimson flag legislation styled after Florida, not the loopy one they only handed,” stated Rubio. “An actual crimson flag legislation that will enable the police division to go earlier than a choose and take away your weapons if they’ll show you’re a hazard. The one they handed permits some co-worker that doesn’t such as you to go to some liberal choose and take away your second modification rights.”
